Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT04506125

Liberal Versus Restrictive Transfusion Threshold in Oncologic surgerY

Liberal Versus Restrictive Transfusion Threshold in High-risk Oncologic surgerY: a Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Pilot Study

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30 (actual)
Sponsor
University Hospital, Brest · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

Anemia is common in oncology. Up to three-quarters of cancer patients are exposed to an episode of anemia. In oncology surgery, perioperative bleeding is a major risk factor for anemia. Indeed, 13 to 40% of patients are transfused in perioperative oncologic surgery. There is an association between anemia and prognosis. Several epidemiological studies have shown a strong association between anemia and altered quality of life. In oncology cohort studies, anemic patients had a significantly lower quality of life compared to patients without anemia. In non-cardiac surgery, preoperative anaemia was significantly associated with post-operative mortality. There is also an association between preoperative anaemia and the occurrence of post-operative complications. In oncology surgery, cohort studies conducted in colorectal surgery and neurosurgery found an association between the occurrence of perioperative anemia and post-operative morbidity and mortality. The optimal transfusion strategy is unknown in oncology patients. Several multicentre randomised trials, conducted in resuscitation patients or in perioperative settings, have compared a "restrictive" to a "liberal" transfusion strategy. These studies did not show a superiority of one strategy over another on patient outcomes but a lower exposure to red blood cell concentrates in patients transfused with the restrictive transfusion strategy. Thus, the French High Authority for Health (HAS) has adopted a haemoglobin level of 7 g/dl as the transfusion threshold for any transfusion of red blood cell concentrate carried out in the operating theatre and in intensive care in the absence of special cases such as the presence of acute coronary syndrome. For oncology patients, no recommendation could be made due to the lack of evidence-based literature and the optimal transfusion strategy for these patients remains unknown. Only 2 monocentric trials performed in oncology (critical care and perioperative) suggest a benefit of a liberal strategy (transfusion for a haemoglobin level \< 9 g/dl) on the short-term vital prognosis, but these studies suffer from numerous limitations leaving the question unresolved. Before conducting a large phase III trial, a pilot study is needed to validate the methodology of this multicentre clinical trial and to assess its feasibility.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
OTHERHaemoglobin 9.5 g/dLtransfusion of red blood cell concentrate if the haemoglobin level is less than 9,5 g/dL
OTHERHaemoglobine 7.5g/dLtransfusion of red blood cell concentrate if the haemoglobin level is less than 7,5 g/dL

Timeline

Start date
2021-03-18
Primary completion
2022-08-29
Completion
2022-08-29
First posted
2020-08-10
Last updated
2023-08-01

Locations

2 sites across 1 country: France

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04506125. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.

Liberal Versus Restrictive Transfusion Threshold in Oncologic surgerY (NCT04506125) · Clinical Trials Directory