Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT04505306

Short-pulse Subthreshold vs Infrared Micropulse for Diabetic Macular Edema

Comparison of Short-pulse Subthreshold (532 nm) and Infrared Micropulse (810 nm) Macular Laser for Diabetic Macular Edema

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
113 (actual)
Sponsor
Moorfields Eye Hospital Centre Abu Dhabi · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

When applied according to manufacturer recommendations, short-pulse system may yield more temporary reduction in edema while infrared micropulse system may yield slightly better functional outcomes.

Detailed description

Purpose: To assess both anatomic and functional outcomes between short-pulse continuous wavelength and infrared micropulse lasers in the treatment of DME. Materials and Methods: A prospective interventional study from tertiary care eye hospital - King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia). Patients with center-involving diabetic macular edema were treated with subthreshold laser therapy. Patients in the micropulse group were treated with the 810-nm diode micropulse scanning laser TxCell™ (IRIDEX Corporation, Mountain View, CA, USA). Laser was applied according to manufacturer recommendations for MicroPulseTM in a confluent mode (low intensity/high density) to the entire area of the macular edema. Patients in the short-pulse group were treated with grid pattern laser with 20ms pulse PASCAL laser 532nm (TopCon Medical Laser Systems, Tokyo, Japan) with EndPoint algorithm, which was either 30% or 50% of testing burn. Main outcome measures included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and foveal thickness at baseline and the last follow-up visit.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDUREMacular LaserAll treatments were performed using SPCW EndPoint 30% and 50% protocols and STMP laser. Patients in the STMP group were treated with the 810-nm diode micropulse scanning laser TxCell™ (IRIDEX Corporation, Mountain View, CA, USA) at 15% duty cycle. Laser was applied in the confluent mode (low intensity/high density) to cover the entire area of the macular edema and leakage as imaged by OCT and/or fundus fluorescein angiography. Patients in the SPCW group were treated with grid pattern laser with 20ms pulse PASCAL laser 532nm (TopCon Medical Laser Systems, Tokyo, Japan) with EndPoint algorithm, which was either 30% or 50% of testing burn with one burn width apart. In both groups, subthreshold power was determined by titrating burn to light (barely visible) burn and switching to either micropulse mode with 15% duty cycle or 30% and 50% EndPoint value.

Timeline

Start date
2015-01-01
Primary completion
2017-01-01
Completion
2017-01-01
First posted
2020-08-10
Last updated
2020-08-10

Locations

1 site across 1 country: United Arab Emirates

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04505306. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.