Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT04500496
Vaginal Dinoprostone Versus Isonicotinic Acid Hydrazide Prior to Diagnostic Office Hysteroscopy
Vaginal Dinoprostone Versus Vaginal Isonicotinic Acid Hydrazide Prior to Diagnostic Office Hysteroscopy in Postmenopausal Patients: a Randomized Controlled Trial
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 200 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Aswan University Hospital · Academic / Other
- Sex
- Female
- Age
- 45 Years – 60 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
To compare the effectiveness of vaginal dinoprostone and vaginal Isonicotinic acid hydrazide in minimizing the pain experienced by postmenopausal patients during diagnostic office hysteroscopy and to assess the ease of insertion of hysteroscope as reported by the hysteroscopist.
Detailed description
hysteroscopy is commonly used in the diagnosis and treatment of intrauterine lesions such as polyps, fibroids, septa, and adhesions, and in the presence of abnormal bleeding and during the removal of an intrauterine device or foreign body. Cervical ripening is made possible by the use of medication through different routes.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DRUG | INH | 3 tablet of INH inserted by the patient 12 hours before the scheduled office hysteroscopy |
| DRUG | dinoprostone | 1 vaginal tablet of dinoprostone (3mg) (prostin® E2, Pharmacia \& Upjohn, Puurs, Belgium) inserted by the patient 12 hours before the scheduled office hysteroscopy. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2020-09-01
- Primary completion
- 2021-12-30
- Completion
- 2022-01-30
- First posted
- 2020-08-05
- Last updated
- 2021-09-29
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Egypt
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04500496. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.