NCT04498624

Inverted Flap Versus Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling in Small Full Thickness Macular Holes

Vitrectomy and Inverted Flap or Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling in Small Full Thickness Macular Holes

• Status: Unknown
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 40 (estimated)
• Sponsor: University of Turin, Italy · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

Primary outcome: difference of microperimetry retinal sensitivity after primary vitrectomy for idiopathic full thickness macular holes with inverted flap technique versus internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling technique Secondary outcomes: difference of visual change after primary vitrectomy for idiopathic full thickness macular holes with inverted flap technique versus internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling technique; difference in closure rate after primary vitrectomy for idiopathic full thickness macular holes with inverted flap technique versus internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling technique

Conditions

• Full Thickness Macular Hole

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
PROCEDURE	inverted flap	full thickness macular hole surgery
PROCEDURE	peeling internal limiting membrane (ILM)	full thickness macular hole surgery

Timeline

• Start date: 2020-05-01
• Primary completion: 2021-05-01
• Completion: 2021-05-01
• First posted: 2020-08-04
• Last updated: 2020-08-04

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Italy