Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Withdrawn

WithdrawnNCT04495010

Neoadjuvant Nivolumab+Ipilimumab Followed by Adjuvant Nivolumab or Neoadjuvant Nivolumab+Ipilimumab Followed by Adjuvant Observation Compared With Adjuvant Nivolumab in Treatment-Naive High-risk Melanoma Participants

A Phase 2, Randomized Study of Neoadjuvant Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Followed by Adjuvant Nivolumab or Neoadjuvant Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Followed by Either Adjuvant Nivolumab or Postsurgical Observation Depending on Pathologic Response Compared With Adjuvant Nivolumab in Treatment-Naive Patients With Resectable Clinically Detectable Stage III Melanoma

Status
Withdrawn
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0 (actual)
Sponsor
Bristol-Myers Squibb · Industry
Sex
All
Age
12 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the role of neoadjuvant immunotherapy and to demonstrate high pathologic complete response (pCR) and near pCR rates in melanoma participants with clinically detectable nodal disease and a high risk of recurrence. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy aims to enhance the systemic T-cell response to tumor antigens while detectable tumor is still present, inducing a stronger and broader tumor-specific immune response. Of the neoadjuvant approaches studied within melanoma, the neoadjuvant combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab has demonstrated high pCR and near pCR rates that may translate to prolonged clinical benefit.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
BIOLOGICALNivolumabSpecified dose on specified days
BIOLOGICALIpilimumabSpecified dose on specified days

Timeline

Start date
2021-03-31
Primary completion
2024-02-28
Completion
2027-10-23
First posted
2020-07-31
Last updated
2021-03-19

Locations

118 sites across 16 countries: United States, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Russia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom

Regulatory

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04495010. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.