Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Unknown

UnknownNCT04483895

Comparison Between the Oro-Helical Length Technique and the 7-8-9 Rule in Determination of the Ideal Endotracheal Tube Insertion Depth in Neonates

Status
Unknown
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120 (estimated)
Sponsor
Ain Shams University · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
1 Day – 28 Days
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

This study was conducted on neonates needing intubation; Group A,: the ETT insertion depth was estimated according to the OHL method. Group B,: the ETT insertion depth was estimated according to the 7-8-9 method.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDUREEndotracheal tube insertionETT was inserted and the depth was estimated by either OHL method or 7-8-9 method

Timeline

Start date
2019-11-15
Primary completion
2020-12-21
Completion
2020-12-21
First posted
2020-07-23
Last updated
2020-07-23

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Egypt

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04483895. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.

Comparison Between the Oro-Helical Length Technique and the 7-8-9 Rule in Determination of the Ideal Endotracheal Tube I (NCT04483895) · Clinical Trials Directory