Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT04478448

Bioequivalence Study of Favipiravir From Flupirava 200 mg Tablet (European Egyptian Pharmaceutical Industries , Egypt) Versus Avigan 200 mg Tablets (Man. by Toyama Chemical Co., Ltd Japan)

An Open Label Randomized, Single Dose, Two-way Crossover Bioequivalence Study to Determine the Bioequivalence of Favipiravir From Flupirava 200 mg Tablet (European Egyptian Pharmaceutical Industries, Egypt) Versus Avigan 200 mg Tablets (Man. by Toyama Chemical Co., Ltd Japan) in Healthy Human Volunteers Under Fasting Condition.

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
26 (actual)
Sponsor
Genuine Research Center, Egypt · Industry
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
Accepted

Summary

An open label randomized, single dose, two-way crossover bioequivalence study to determine the bioequivalence of Favipiravir from Flupirava 200 mg tablet (European Egyptian Pharmaceutical Industries, Egypt) versus Avigan 200 mg Tablets (Man. by Toyama Chemical Co., Ltd Japan) in Healthy Human Volunteers Under Fasting Condition.

Detailed description

Primary Pharmacokinetic Parameters: Cmax, AUC0→t and AUC0→∞ Secondary Pharmacokinetic Parameters: Ke, tmax and t1/2e. ANOVA using 5% significance level for transformed (with the 90% confidence intervals) and untransformed data of Cmax, AUC0→t and AUC0→∞ and for untransformed data of Ke, tmax and t1/2e. The confidence intervals of logarithmically transformed Test/Reference ratios for Cmax, AUC0→t and AUC0→∞ to be within 80.00-125.00%. A comprehensive final report will be issued upon the completion of the study.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DRUGFlupirava1 tablet contains 200 mg Favipiravir
DRUGAvigan1 tablet contains 200 mg Favipiravir

Timeline

Start date
2020-08-13
Primary completion
2020-08-20
Completion
2020-08-26
First posted
2020-07-20
Last updated
2020-09-02

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Egypt

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04478448. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.