Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT04475913

Digital vs Analog Impression in Cases of All-on-4 - Prosthesis

In a Post -Covid-19 World, What is the Clinical Influence of Digital vs Analog Impression in Cases of All-on-4 - Prosthesis ?

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
56 (actual)
Sponsor
October University for Modern Sciences and Arts · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
50 Years – 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

Fifty six patients were randomly enrolled in the study. Participants were randomly stratified into two control groups and two test groups, from which conventional pick up and digital impressions were made respectively. Patients of group 1 (CIG Axial) and 3 (DIG Axial) received 4 axial implants whereas, group 2 patients (CIG Tilted), and group 4 (DIG Tilted) received two anterior axial implants and two distal tilted implants. All participants received hybrid dentures. Bone loss, implant loss, maintenance of prosthesis were evaluated at 6m,12m, and 24 months follow up period.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
OTHERDIG Axialpatients received 4 axial implants and digital impression
OTHERDIG Tiltedreceived two anterior axial implants and two distal tilted implants, and digital impression
OTHERCIG Axialpatients received 4 axial implants and conventional impression
OTHERCIG Tiltedreceived two anterior axial implants and two distal tilted implants, and conventional impression

Timeline

Start date
2018-07-11
Primary completion
2020-07-11
Completion
2020-08-20
First posted
2020-07-17
Last updated
2021-03-01

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Egypt

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04475913. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.