Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT04475913
Digital vs Analog Impression in Cases of All-on-4 - Prosthesis
In a Post -Covid-19 World, What is the Clinical Influence of Digital vs Analog Impression in Cases of All-on-4 - Prosthesis ?
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 56 (actual)
- Sponsor
- October University for Modern Sciences and Arts · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 50 Years – 65 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Fifty six patients were randomly enrolled in the study. Participants were randomly stratified into two control groups and two test groups, from which conventional pick up and digital impressions were made respectively. Patients of group 1 (CIG Axial) and 3 (DIG Axial) received 4 axial implants whereas, group 2 patients (CIG Tilted), and group 4 (DIG Tilted) received two anterior axial implants and two distal tilted implants. All participants received hybrid dentures. Bone loss, implant loss, maintenance of prosthesis were evaluated at 6m,12m, and 24 months follow up period.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| OTHER | DIG Axial | patients received 4 axial implants and digital impression |
| OTHER | DIG Tilted | received two anterior axial implants and two distal tilted implants, and digital impression |
| OTHER | CIG Axial | patients received 4 axial implants and conventional impression |
| OTHER | CIG Tilted | received two anterior axial implants and two distal tilted implants, and conventional impression |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2018-07-11
- Primary completion
- 2020-07-11
- Completion
- 2020-08-20
- First posted
- 2020-07-17
- Last updated
- 2021-03-01
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Egypt
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04475913. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.