Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT04458961
MIKROBE Management of Infected Knee Replacements-Obtaining Best Evidence
MIKROBE Management of Infected Knee Replacements-Obtaining Best Evidence A Feasibility Study for a Randomised Controlled Trial of One-stage or Two-stage Surgery for Prosthetic Knee Infection
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 3 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Following a prosthetic knee joint infection, two types of operative approach can be undertaken to treat the infection: a one-stage or two-stage revision operation. Both approaches are widely used and are good at treating infection but we don't know which has the best long-term outcomes for patients. This trial aims to assess the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial to evaluate whether treating a prosthetic knee infection with one-stage revision surgery gives a better outcome than two-stage revision surgery in terms of patient function and pain, and cost-effectiveness.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | One-stage | A one-stage revision operation involves one operation to remove the joint, thoroughly cleaning the infected area and then implanting a new joint immediately. |
| PROCEDURE | Two-stage | A two-stage revision operation involves two operations: the joint is removed in one operation, a temporary spacer device is inserted, then the infection is treated with antibiotics, and then a new joint is implanted in a second operation. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2020-11-17
- Primary completion
- 2023-01-30
- Completion
- 2023-01-30
- First posted
- 2020-07-07
- Last updated
- 2023-11-18
Locations
2 sites across 1 country: United Kingdom
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04458961. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.