Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT04454099

A Comparison of Different Fecal Occult Blood Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening

A Comparison of Quantitative Fecal Immunochemical Test and Qualitative Fecal Occult Blood Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Medium and High Risk Screening Population

Status
Completed
Phase
Study type
Observational
Enrollment
1,000 (actual)
Sponsor
Shandong University · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
50 Years – 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality. CRC-related death can be prevented through fecal occult blood test screening. Because of economic and high sensitivity, fecal immunochemical test is recommended for screening population of CRC. The purpose of this study is to compare the accuracy of 4 different fecal occult blood testing in medium and high risk screening population in Chinese.

Detailed description

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancer worldwide, and cause a huge number of cancer-associated mortality. CRC screening has been shown to be effective in reducing the incidence of, and mortality from, CRC. There are several recommended screening options for screening population of CRC, including colonoscopy and fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) .Colonoscopy has higher sensitivity and specificity than FOBT for detecting advanced colorectal neoplasia but also has several disadvantages, including higher cost and poorer compliance. Therefore, many patients prefer FOBT to colonoscopy. FOBT includes guaiac-based fecal occult blood test (gFOBT) and fecal immunochemical test (FIT). FIT includes quantitative FIT (qFIT) and qualitative FIT. qFIT can provide a value of concentration of hemoglobin in stool and are increasingly recommended for CRC. In China, the most common use FOBT is qualitative FIT and the comparison of quantitative and qualitative FIT is lack in screening population of CRC in Chinese. To add to the evidence on FIT performance characteristics for detection of CRC, the investigators design this research to compare qFIT with other 3 qualitative FOBT(two of them are colloidal gold qualitative FITs and one of them is chemical and immunologic combined detection)in medium and high risk screening population.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DIAGNOSTIC_TEST4 kind of FOBT and colonoscopy with pathological examinationDetect Hb in stool by 4 kind of FOBT and detect colon lesion using colonoscopy and pathological examination.

Timeline

Start date
2020-07-01
Primary completion
2021-03-18
Completion
2021-03-18
First posted
2020-07-01
Last updated
2021-05-04

Locations

1 site across 1 country: China

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04454099. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.