NCT04451473

Lung Surgery With Enhanced Recovery VS. Lung Surgery Without Enhanced Recovery

The Short Term and Long Term Comparison of Lung Surgery With or Without Enhanced Recovery

• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 350 (estimated)
• Sponsor: The Second Hospital of Shandong University · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years – 85 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

Objective: The adoption of Enhanced Recovery Surgery programs in lung resection is relatively recent with limited outcome data. This study aimed to determine the impact of an Enhanced Recovery Surgery pathway on short- term and long- term results in patients undergoing lung resection for primary lung cancer. Methods: A Randomized Controlled Trial was designed to collect the perioperative data on consecutive patients undergoing lung resection for primary lung cancer. Patients will be randomizely assigned to the ERAS- Group and Control- Group. Short-term and long- term effect will be compared between the two groups.

Conditions

• Lung Cancer
• Surgery
• ERAS

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
PROCEDURE	Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS )	the treatment of procedure according to Guidelines for enhanced recovery after lung surgery: recommendations of the ERAS Society and the ESTS
PROCEDURE	Traditional perioperative management without Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS )	the treatment of procedure not abiding Guidelines for enhanced recovery after lung surgery

Timeline

• Start date: 2019-10-08
• Primary completion: 2023-06-30
• Completion: 2027-06-30
• First posted: 2020-06-30
• Last updated: 2022-11-16

Locations

1 site across 1 country: China