Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT04389697

Fasting Versus Non-Fasting for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices (FastCIED Study)

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
201 (actual)
Sponsor
Helios Health Institute GmbH · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

There was no evidence to suggest that a shortened fluid fast results in an increased risk of aspiration, regurgitation or related morbidity compared with the standard 'nil by mouth from midnight' fasting policy. However, there is no available data regarding the safety and efficacy of fasting approach in patients undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) procedures. The aim of this study is to demonstrate that a non-fasting protocol is non-inferior in regard to safety to a fasting protocol (current practice) in patients undergoing cardiac device implantation procedures

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTClear fluids and food up to up to 1 hour before the procedureClear fluids and food up to up to 1 hour before the start of the procedure

Timeline

Start date
2020-01-29
Primary completion
2020-11-06
Completion
2020-12-06
First posted
2020-05-15
Last updated
2021-03-17

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Germany

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04389697. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.

Fasting Versus Non-Fasting for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices (FastCIED Study) (NCT04389697) · Clinical Trials Directory