Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Unknown

UnknownNCT04358263

Is Real-time CGM Superior to Flash Glucose Monitoring

Comparison of CGM in Randomised Study of Real-time and Intermittently-scanned Systems in T1D With Normal Awareness of Hypoglycemia (CORRIDA)

Status
Unknown
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60 (actual)
Sponsor
Charles University, Czech Republic · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

The aim of the investigator's study is to compare real-time continuous glucose monitoring and flash glucose monitoring in adult patients with Type 1 Diabetes during 4-day training program focused on physical activity and over 4 weeks of follow-up.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DEVICEContinuous Glucose Monitoring Guardian Connect Mobile system (real-time continuous glucose monitoring)rtCGM and isCGM are used in Type 1 diabetic patients to improve glucose control and to minimize or avoid severe hypoglycaemia.
DEVICEContinuous Glucose Monitoring FreeStyle Libre Flash system (intermittently-scanned continuous glucose monitoring)rtCGM and isCGM are used in Type 1 diabetic patients to improve glucose control and to minimize or avoid severe hypoglycaemia.

Timeline

Start date
2018-09-01
Primary completion
2019-04-30
Completion
2020-11-30
First posted
2020-04-24
Last updated
2020-04-28

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Czechia

Regulatory

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04358263. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.

Is Real-time CGM Superior to Flash Glucose Monitoring (NCT04358263) · Clinical Trials Directory