Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Recruiting

RecruitingNCT04341350

Comparison of an Inhaled Sedation Strategy to an Intravenous Sedation Strategy in Intensive Care Unit Patients Treated With Invasive Mechanical Ventilation

Comparison of an Inhaled Sedation Strategy to an Intravenous Sedation Strategy in Intensive Care Unit Patients Treated With Invasive Mechanical Ventilation : INASED Study

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
250 (estimated)
Sponsor
University Hospital, Brest · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

The objective of the study is to determine the impact on the frequency of occurrence of delirium of an early inhaled sedation strategy (from induction in rapid sequence if intubation in intensive care, or from admission if intubated in pre -hospital) by Isoflurane using an ANACONDA ™ type system, compared to a conventional intravenous sedation strategy.

Detailed description

Sedation-analgesia is used in most patients treated with mechanical ventilation (MV). The usual benzodiazepine and morphine sedation reduces pain and anxiety and allows tolerance of invasive procedures in intensive care. These molecules, used as part of the sedation titration protocol or the daily sedation stop protocol, have improved patient outcomes. Although necessary, these drugs, by mechanisms still uncertain, would promote the occurrence of resuscitation delirium. Delirium itself responsible for worsening morbidity and mortality (increase in the duration of MV, increase in the length of hospital stay, discussed increase in mortality, long-term cognitive sequelae). This finding favored the use of new drugs in the sedation strategies of patients on MV. Dexmedetomidine has for example reduced the number of days of delirium, the number of days of coma and even mortality in septic patients. Its large-scale use has however been questioned by a recent study. Halogenated gases have been used for a long time in anesthesia. Their pharmacodynamics, their positive and adverse effects, their therapeutic margins are well known. Thanks to technical innovations they can be used on resuscitation respirators. Several studies on targeted populations have shown the feasibility and the benefits of this use, in particular, the absence of accumulation, the absence of tachyphylaxis, the broad therapeutic range, the small interindividual variation, the rapidity of efficacy and the speed of awakening. Safety in use for the staff in charge of the patient is established. In addition, their potential neuroprotective effect would make it an anesthetic of choice in the prevention of resuscitation delirium.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DRUGPropofol + analgesic drugsedation according to a written, standardized Nurse management protocol using at least one sedative drug (propofol) and one analgesic drug. It uses the nurse driven analgesia protocol of each ward involved in the study. It uses a pain assessment score (BPS, VICOMORE, FLACC), local or regional anesthesia, non-opioïd adjuncts (acetaminophen, NSAIDs, nefopam), opioïds (per os opioïds, bolus of sufentanyl followed by continuous infusion if necessary, continuous infusion of remifentanyl
DRUGIsoflurane + analgesic drugsedation by inhalation of halogenated gas (Isoflurane) delivered by the Anesthetic-Conserving Device (ACD) system ANACONDA ™ associated with the administration of a analgesic drug. It uses the nurse driven analgesia protocol of each ward involved in the study. It uses a pain assessment score (BPS, VICOMORE, FLACC), local or regional anesthesia, non-opioïd adjuncts (acetaminophen, NSAIDs, nefopam), opioïds (per os opioïds, bolus of sufentanyl followed by continuous infusion if necessary, continuous infusion of remifentanyl.

Timeline

Start date
2020-08-06
Primary completion
2025-08-01
Completion
2026-08-01
First posted
2020-04-10
Last updated
2025-04-04

Locations

12 sites across 1 country: France

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04341350. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.