Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT04339361
Comparative Efficacy of Lidocaine Spray Versus Vaginal Dinoprostone in IUD Insertion
Comparative Safety and Efficacy of Lidocaine Spray Versus Vaginal Dinoprostone in Relieving Pain During Levonorgestrel IUD Insertion
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 111 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Cairo University · Academic / Other
- Sex
- Female
- Age
- —
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
Summary
the aim of this study is to compare the safety and Efficacy of Lidocaine Spray Versus Vaginal dinoprostone in relieving pain during levonorgestrel IUD Insertion in nulliparous women
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DRUG | lidocaine spray | four puffs (50 ml, 10 mg/puff) of lidocaine spray before tenaculum placement plus vaginal placebo 3 hours before IUD insertion |
| DRUG | vaginal dinoprostone | vaginal dinoprostone 3 mg will be given 3 hours before IUD insertion plus four puffs of saline spray before tenaculum placement |
| DRUG | placebo | vaginal placebo will be given 3 hours before IUD insertion plus four puffs of saline spray before tenaculum placement |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2020-04-25
- Primary completion
- 2020-08-10
- Completion
- 2020-08-15
- First posted
- 2020-04-09
- Last updated
- 2020-04-09
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04339361. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.