Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT04339049
Comparative Efficacy of Lidocaine Spray Versus Vaginal Misoprostol in IUD Insertion
Comparative Efficacy of Lidocaine Spray Versus Vaginal Misoprostol in Reducing Pain During IUD Insertion in Adolescents and Nulliparous Women: a Randomized Controlled Trial
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 147 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Cairo University · Academic / Other
- Sex
- Female
- Age
- —
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
Summary
the aim of the present study is to compare the safety and efficacy of lidocaine spray versus misoprostol in reducing pain during IUD insertion in adolescents and nulliparous women
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DRUG | lidocaine spray | four puffs (10 mg/puff) of lidocaine spray before tenaculum placement plus vaginal placebo 3 hours before IUD insertion |
| DRUG | vaginal misoprostol | vaginal misoprostol 200 mcg given 3 hours before IUD insertion plus four puffs of saline spray before tenaculum placement |
| DRUG | placebo | vaginal placebo given 3 hours before IUD insertion plus four puffs of saline spray before tenaculum placement |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2020-05-01
- Primary completion
- 2021-07-17
- Completion
- 2021-07-30
- First posted
- 2020-04-08
- Last updated
- 2021-12-10
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Egypt
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04339049. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.