Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT04338737
Post Operative Feeding After Cesarean Section
A Randomized Controlled Study of Early Versus Delayed Oral Post Operative Feeding After Cesarean Section
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 300 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Kasr El Aini Hospital · Academic / Other
- Sex
- Female
- Age
- 20 Years – 40 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
3 different post ceseraen secton feeding regmen are compared
Detailed description
300 women admitted to the labor and delivery unit in kasr Elainy teaching hospital, Following the decision to perform a cesarean section because of obstetric indications. The study involved only elective cesarean sections. The 300 patients participated in this work and will be randomly and equally divided into three groups: 1. Group A : It consists of 100 patients that will be allocated for early post-operative oral feeding receiving water and clear fluid approximately 2 hours after surgery, followed by soft food and regular diet 4 hours later irrespective to intestinal sounds, flatus or stool. 2. Group B : It consists of 100 patients that will be allocated for early Postoperative oral feeding receiving water and clear fluid approximately 2 hours after surgery till the return of intestinal sounds, then soft food and regular diet later on. 3. Group C : It consists of 100 patients that will receive no oral feeding till passage of flatus instead 2 to 3 Litres of intravenous fluid will be used for feeding. Water and fluid will be then offered, followed by soft foods and then a regular diet.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| OTHER | timming of feeding | post-operative oral feeding receiving water and clear fluid after surgery, followed by soft food and regular diet |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2020-06-01
- Primary completion
- 2021-03-01
- Completion
- 2021-04-01
- First posted
- 2020-04-08
- Last updated
- 2020-04-08
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04338737. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.