Trials / Withdrawn
WithdrawnNCT04334018
Multi Point Pacing vs. Conventional STUDY PROTOCOL
Observational, Multicentre, Investigator and Patient Blinded, Prospective, Randomized Comparator Study of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) Multi Point Pacing (MPP) Compared to Conventional CRT Pacing Response in Heart Failure Patients.
- Status
- Withdrawn
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 0 (actual)
- Sponsor
- CMC Ambroise Paré · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
The Purpose of this study is to compare two programming modalities for CRT devices in Heart Failure patients with an indication for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DEVICE | conventional CRT | Conventional CRT or biventricular pacing "resynchronizes" left ventricular contraction by pacing the right and left ventricles (LV) simultaneously |
| DEVICE | MPP CRT | CRT with Multipoint pacing (MPP) where pacing can occur from more than one LV site simultaneously |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2018-03-01
- Primary completion
- 2023-03-01
- Completion
- 2023-03-01
- First posted
- 2020-04-03
- Last updated
- 2020-04-03
Locations
6 sites across 2 countries: France, Monaco
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04334018. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.