NCT04324008

Clinical Comparison of Different Flowable Resin Composites

• Status: Active Not Recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 28 (actual)
• Sponsor: Hacettepe University · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years – 65 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Accepted

Summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate a self-adhesive flowable resin composite, a flowable resin composite with high viscosity and a conventional flowable resin composite in combination with a universal adhesive using two different application modes. All patients will receive at least 4 occlusal restorations. Cavities will be divided into four groups according to restorative systems used: Constic (a self-adhering flowable composite), G-ænial Universal Flo (a highly filled flowable composite), Tetric N-Flow (self-etch) (a conventional flowable composite), Tetrin N-Flow (etch\&rinse).

Conditions

• Tooth Diseases

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
DEVICE	Constic	Flowable resin composite
DEVICE	G-ænial Universal Flo	Flowable resin composite
DEVICE	Tetric N-Flow (self-etch)	Tetric N-Flow (Tetric N-Bond Universal, self-etch mode)
DEVICE	Tetric N-Flow (etch&rinse)	Tetric N-Flow (Tetric N-Bond Universal, etch\&rinse mode)

Timeline

• Start date: 2017-11-01
• Primary completion: 2018-01-01
• Completion: 2026-11-01
• First posted: 2020-03-27
• Last updated: 2025-12-03

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Turkey (Türkiye)