Trials / Recruiting
RecruitingNCT04304651
Screening for Occult Malignancy in Patients with Unprovoked Venous Thromboembolism
Screening for Occult Malignancy Using 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (FDG PET/CT) in Patients with Unprovoked Venous Thromboembolism
- Status
- Recruiting
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 1,276 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- University Hospital, Brest · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 50 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) can be the earliest sign of cancer. Identifying occult cancers at the time of VTE diagnosis may lead to significant improvement of patients' care. This is also an upmost issue for patients who want to know if an underlying cancer might have triggered the VTE. An individual patient-level data meta-analysis (IPDMA) supports extensive screening strategies for occult cancer especially based on FDG PET/CT, and suggests that the best target population for cancer screening would be patients with unprovoked VTE older than 50 years of age (6.7% in patients aged 50 years or more vs. 1.0% in patients of less than 50 years (OR: 7.1, 95% CI: 3.1 to 16%).
Detailed description
The identification of subgroups of patients at high risk of cancer might enable more efficient screening strategies for early detection of cancer. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) can be the first manifestation of an occult cancer. All tumor sites may be involved. In an individual patient-level data meta-analysis (IPDMA), it was reported a 1-year prevalence of occult cancer of 5.2% (95%CI 4.1-6.5) among patients presenting with unprovoked VTE. Two recent multicenter randomized controlled trials (e.g. SOME (Canada) and MVTEP (France) trials) failed to demonstrate that extensive cancer screening strategies diagnosed more cancers, more early stage tumors, or improved cancer-related mortality in comparison with a more limited screening strategy. However, the main limitation of these studies was the twice lower than expected overall incidence of occult cancer diagnosis in unselected patients with unprovoked VTE, which limited the statistical power. In the IPDMA, it was also reported that the 1-year period prevalence of occult cancer was 7-fold higher in patients aged ≥ 50 (6.8%; 95%CI 5.6-8.3) as compared with those \< 50 years (1.0%; 95%CI 0.5-2.3). Moreover, in the MVTEP trial, the incidence of missed cancers over a 2-years follow-up period was significantly lower in patients randomized to a 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission/Computed Tomography (FDG-PET/CT) screening strategy. Thus, the most promising diagnostic modality for occult cancer screening seems to be FDG-PET/CT. FDG-PET/CT which allows a one-stop whole-body imaging, is routinely used for the diagnosis, staging and restaging of various cancers. The MVTEP2 Trial seeks to determine if among higher risk patients (≥ 50 year-old) with a first unprovoked VTE, a cancer screening strategy including a FDG-PET/CT decreases the number of missed occult cancers detected over a 1-year follow-up period as compared with a limited screening alone.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DIAGNOSTIC_TEST | Limited cancer screening | The limited cancer screening will include: 1) a complete medical history and physical examination; 2) complete blood count; 3) liver function tests (AST, ALT, ALP, bilirubin); and 4) chest X-ray. In women, a breast examination, Pap smear/pelvic examination (if \< 70 years old and previously sexually active) and mammogram will be performed, if not conducted in last year. In men, similarly, prostate examination and PSA testing will be performed, if not conducted in the last year. All patients will undergo colon cancer screening as per local practice. |
| DIAGNOSTIC_TEST | Limited cancer screening + FDG PET/CT | The limited cancer screening (as described above) in combination with a FDG PET/CT. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2020-09-08
- Primary completion
- 2026-09-08
- Completion
- 2030-09-08
- First posted
- 2020-03-11
- Last updated
- 2024-12-16
Locations
20 sites across 2 countries: Canada, France
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04304651. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.