NCT04300738

Evaluation and Comparison of Two Biomarkers (VOP and SCC) for the Prognosis of the Occurrence of Clinical Cardiovascular Events

• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 220 (actual)
• Sponsor: Clinique Bizet · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

The aim of our study is to assess the Cardiovascular risk and the quality of the arteries by comparing the Coronary Calcium Score SCC measured with a CT scann and the Pulse Wave Velocity PWV measured with pOpmeter for the prognosis at 6 months of clinical events. Is there a superiority of PWV compared to SCC:

Detailed description

Two method of cardiovascular risk screening are compared in patient going for Coronary Calcium Score measurement in a outpatient clinic. Ct Scann is expensive, learning time is for at least 2 years, and the reliability is operator dependent. The Pulse Wave Velocity is measured using a new device with half an hour learning curve, and you get a result within 2 minutes. 1. A non-invasive medical device vs invasive 2. A better benefit-risk ratio 3. A lower diagnostic cost both for equipment and for qualification for use and learning time

Conditions

• Cardiovascular Risk Factor

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
DEVICE	CCS wit CT Scann measurement	Measurement with 2 devices

Timeline

• Start date: 2020-05-15
• Primary completion: 2021-02-05
• Completion: 2022-02-15
• First posted: 2020-03-09
• Last updated: 2022-03-09

Locations

1 site across 1 country: France