Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT04299659

Comparison of Four Methods for Entering the Gap Position of Landolt Cs

Comparison of Four Methods for Entering the Gap Position of Landolt Cs With Respect to Validity, Retest Reliability, Examination Duration and Test Subject Satisfaction

Status
Completed
Phase
Study type
Observational
Enrollment
24 (actual)
Sponsor
Aalen University · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Accepted

Summary

The aim of this study is to investigate and compare the validity of four different input methods for Landolt Cs, i.e. the proportion of correct gap positions in relation to the total number of performances. The four input methods are a numeric keypad, an eight-positions rocker switch, a remote control and voice feedback.

Detailed description

The measurement of visual acuity is the most frequent and one of the most important ophthalmological functional investigations. Therefore, it is particularly important to find a measuring procedure with as little input errors as possible. The 8-position Landolt C (LC) is the internationally accepted, well-standardised optotype for the determination of visual acuity. Usually, the subjects informs the examiner verbally about the perceived position of each LC. According to the current literature, about 20 to 30 % of the population suffers from a right/left weakness. Furthermore, language barriers are an additional considerable hurdle. Therefore, it is important to find an input method for the LC gap positions with minimal entry mistakes. In oder to avoid the thresholding procedure and its inherent difficulties, highly supra-threshold (10 times above the previously determined individual central visual acuity threshold) 8-position LCs are presented. The study compares four input methods for entering of the Landolt C gap positions: a modified numeric keypad, an 8-position rocker switch, a modified TV remote control and voice/verbal feedback. Each subject will perform all four input methods, with 2 test runs of 16 Landolt C presentations, each. A forced-choice method will be applied, i.e. the test is not continued until the test person has responded ot each single presentation. Regardless of whether the entry was correct or incorrect, the next Landolt C is displayed. The optotypes are presented using modified version of the Freiburg Visual Acuity and Contrast Test (FrACT), which allows to present the 8-position Landolt Cs in a standardized way on a video display unit (VDU). The sequence of the input methods is randomized. This study is carried out in a "within-subject design", i.e. all test persons go through all test conditions and serve as their own controls.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DIAGNOSTIC_TESTLandolt C entry methodFour different methods for entering the Landolt C gap position are compared

Timeline

Start date
2022-07-22
Primary completion
2023-03-01
Completion
2023-06-30
First posted
2020-03-09
Last updated
2023-07-20

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Germany

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04299659. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.