Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT04295590
Impact of Augmenting Exercise Intensity vs. Frequency
Impact of Augmenting Exercise Intensity vs. Frequency on Peak Work Rate
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 16 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Brendon Gurd, PhD · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 30 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the impact of augmenting exercise intensity and augmenting exercise frequency on peak work rate. Participants will complete exercise tests and provide 8 skeletal muscle samples following a within-subjects randomized crossover design utilizing single-leg cycling. Both training periods will be 4 weeks long and skeletal muscle biopsies will be collected from both legs before and after each training period. All exercise sessions will be supervised, take place in the investigator's laboratory, and occur on stationary bikes.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BEHAVIORAL | Frequency comparison | One leg assigned to low-frequency low-intensity (3 days per week of 11 x 1 min @ 73% peak work rate interspersed with 1-minute periods of active recovery). The other leg assigned to high-frequency low-intensity (5 days per week of 11 x 1 min @ 73% peak work rate interspersed with 1-minute periods of active recovery). |
| BEHAVIORAL | Intensity comparison | One leg assigned to low-frequency low-intensity (3 days per week of 11 x 1 min @ 73% peak work rate interspersed with 1-minute periods of active recovery). The other leg assigned to low-frequency high-intensity (3 days per week of 8 x 1 min @ 100% peak work rate interspersed with 1-minute periods of active recovery). |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2019-09-30
- Primary completion
- 2020-04-10
- Completion
- 2020-04-10
- First posted
- 2020-03-04
- Last updated
- 2020-03-04
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Canada
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04295590. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.