Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT04280094

Can Ideal Mesh Size be Standardized in Open Inguinal Hernia Repair

Can the Ideal Mesh Size be Standardized for Open Inguinal Hernia Repair; An Anthropometric Study in Central Anatolian Male Patients

Status
Completed
Phase
Study type
Observational
Enrollment
1 (actual)
Sponsor
Konya Meram State Hospital · Academic / Other
Sex
Male
Age
18 Years – 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
Accepted

Summary

Two hundred consecutive unilateral inguinal hernia patients will be included in the study. Patients will be recorded by measuring the distance between the pubic tubercle and the deep inguinal ring, the distance between the inguinal ligament and the internal oblique aponeurosis, the distance between the deep and superficial inguinal ring diameters and their anterior superior iliac spine. The contribution of these measures to the determination of the ideal mesh size will be analyzed.

Detailed description

This prospective study includes 200 consecutive male patients who underwent unilateral open inguinal hernia repair since March 2020. Under-18 hernias, complicated hernias, recurrent hernias, and those with laparoscopic hernia repair will be excluded. Initially, the distance between the pubic tubercle and the medial edge of the deep inguinal ring will be measured. Next, the distance between the inner edge of the inguinal ligament and the upper level of the internal oblique aponeurosis will be measured at the Hesselbach triangle. Hesselbach triangle area will be calculated. The diameter of the superficial and deep inguinal ring and their spina iliaca anterior superior (SIAS) distance will be measured. The contribution of these measures to the determination of the ideal mesh size will be analyzed.

Conditions

Timeline

Start date
2020-06-02
Primary completion
2020-10-30
Completion
2020-11-30
First posted
2020-02-21
Last updated
2024-02-28

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Turkey (Türkiye)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04280094. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.