Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT04236115

Comparison of Articaine and Prilocaine for Extraction of Maxillary Teeth

Does Articaine, Rather Than Prilocaine, Increase the Success Rate of Anaesthesia for Extraction of Maxillary Teeth

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
95 (actual)
Sponsor
Taibah University · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
16 Years – 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

Ninety-five patients, aged between 16 and 70 years old, were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups. Group one received Articaine 4% with 1:00.000 Adrenalines. Group two received Prilocaine with 3% Felypressin (0.03 I.U. per ml). Onset time of anaesthesia was objectively evaluated by using electronic pulp testing.

Detailed description

85 patients in this study had successful local anaesthetic followed by extraction within the study duration time (10 minutes). However, there were six patients with failure anaesthesia (5 in prilocaine group and 1 in articaine group). By application Person's Chi-square test (x2), there were no significant differences in the number of the episodes of the anaesthetic success between articaine and prilocaine groups at time intervals (P-value = 0.5). T- test showed there have been no important variations within the mean onset time of anaesthesia for articaine and prilocaine buccal infiltrations (P-value =0.1).

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DRUGArticaine 4%Articaine 4% is dental local anaesthetic agent
DRUGPrilocain 3%prilocaine is dental local anaesthetic agent
DRUGAdrenalinadrenaline is a vasoconstrictor
DRUGFelypressinFelypressin is a vasoconstrictor

Timeline

Start date
2017-09-20
Primary completion
2018-04-20
Completion
2018-06-20
First posted
2020-01-22
Last updated
2020-01-22

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Saudi Arabia

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04236115. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.