Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT04226443
The Use of Midazolam and Remifentanil During Dialysis Access Procedures
The Use of Midazolam and Remifentanil During Arteriovenous Fistula Placement Procedure and Monitored Anesthesia Care
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 99 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Kartal Kosuyolu Yuksek Ihtisas Education and Research Hospital · Other Government
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 43 Years – 81 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
BACKGROUND: Sedation and analgesia are related to unexpected adverse events in chronic renal failure patients undergoing arteriovenous fistula placement procedures under monitored anesthesia care (MAC). OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to investigate and compare the sedation and analgesia related effects and adverse effects of continuous intravenous use of midazolam and intermittent bolus doses of midazolam while intravenous remifentanil is used as a rescue medication in patients with chronic renal failure.
Detailed description
BACKGROUND: Sedation and analgesia are related to unexpected adverse events in chronic renal failure patients undergoing arteriovenous fistula placement procedures under monitored anesthesia care (MAC). OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to investigate and compare the sedation and analgesia related effects and adverse effects of continuous intravenous use of midazolam to intermittent bolus doses of midazolam while intravenous remifentanil is used as a rescue medication in patients with chronic renal failure. DESIGN: From a total of 116 patients, 99 patients with chronic renal failure undergoing arteriovenous fistula procedures were included in a prospective randomized study. SETTINGS: Two tertiary care hospitals. PATIENTS: The patients were divided into Group 1 (continuous)(n=50); patients receiving intravenous midazolam infusion at a dose of 0.02 to 0.04 mg/kg/h and Group 2 (intermittent)(n=49); patients receiving intermittent intravenous bolus doses of 0.015 mg/kg every 10 minutes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were; 1- The total amount of doses of the use of midazolam and remifentanil in both groups of patients, 2- The evaluation of satisfaction of patient and surgeon at the end of the operation, in the recovery room during the period of recovery from sedation and before discharge. Other outcome measures include; the sedative, analgesic and hemodynamical effects of sedative medications that were compared in both groups of patients during the operation time period. The hospital stay duration was recorded and compared between groups. The maximum dose of midazolam was limited to 4 mg intravenously. The intensity of pain was assessed using a verbal numerical sedation scale (range 1 to 10) (VNRS) and the sedation level was recorded by Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale (MOSS/A) (range 0 to 6). MOSS/A Scale includes; Score 0: Does not respond to deep stimulus, Score 1: Does not respond to mild prodding or shaking, Score 2: Responds only after mild prodding or shaking, Score 3: Responds only after name is called loudly and/or repeatedly, Score 4: Lethargic response to name spoken in normal tone, Score 5: Responds readily to name spoken in normal tone, Score 6: Agitated. An intravenous bolus dose of remifentanil as a rescue medication was administered for pain scores greater than 3 at a dose of 5µg/mL. Adverse events were recorded. Patient satisfaction level depending on the experience in general were evaluated at discharge from 0 to 4 point numerical scale: 0 = extremely dissatisfied; 1 = dissatisfied; 2 = neither satisfied nor dissatisfied; 3 = satisfied; 4 = extremely satisfied. Surgeon satisfaction level depending on the experience in general were evaluated at discharge from five-point numerical scale: 0 = extremely poor; 1 = poor; 2 = fair; 3 = good; 4 = excellent. SAMPLE SIZE: The sample size was calculated based on a power of 80% and a 5% type-I error and for each group, thirty patients were required.
Conditions
- Sedative Adverse Reaction
- Analgesic Adverse Reaction
- Midazolam Adverse Reaction
- Adverse Reaction to Drug
- Patient Satisfaction
- Chronic Kidney Diseases
- Arteriovenous Fistula
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DRUG | Midazolam intravenous injection | The midazolam was prepared as 5 mg midazolam in 20 mL syringe of 5% dextrose water solution (0.25 mg/mL) in both arms. Both groups of patients received an intravenous bolus dose of midazolam was administered before the start of the surgery. In Group 1, continuous infusion of intravenous midazolam was started and in Group 2, intravenous bolus doses of midazolam were administered. The doses were adjusted depending on pain level and sedation level using appropriate scales for monitoring during the surgical time period. The drip rate was adjusted according to pain intensity. The infusion of drugs was discontinued at the end of the procedure. |
| DRUG | Remifentanil intravenous bolus dose | A remifentanil infusion was prepared as follows; 0.5 mg remifentanil was added into 100 mL of 0.9% saline at a concentration of 5 μg/mL. The preparation of remifentanil solution and installation of the device was done by an anesthesiologist who was blinded for the study groups. The dose and number of patients that required remifentanil were recorded. The infusion of drugs was discontinued at the end of the procedure. A rescue medication of intravenous remifentanil bolus dose was used as 1 to 3 mL (5 μg or 15 μg) every 5 minutes if necessary for pain scores greater than 3. This infusion was prepared prior to the use during the study and was discontinued at the end of the procedure. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2012-08-28
- Primary completion
- 2016-04-15
- Completion
- 2016-04-30
- First posted
- 2020-01-13
- Last updated
- 2020-01-13
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04226443. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.