Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT04220294
Subcutaneous Continuous Versus Interrupted Sutures During Cesarean Section.
Surgical Site Infection Rate After Subcutaneous Continuous Versus Interrupted Sutures During Cesarean Section.
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 1,238 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Rambam Health Care Campus · Academic / Other
- Sex
- Female
- Age
- 18 Years – 45 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
A comparison of the rate of surgical site infections after cesarean section depending on the type of suture used for subcutaneous closure-continuous versus interrupted.
Detailed description
Patients at term that are candidates for elective cesarean section will receive an explanation regarding the study and sign informed consent. Patients will then be divided randomly to one of 2 treatment groups based on the type of subcutaneous tissue closure: 1. Interrupted sutures. 2. Continuous sutures. Information regarding medical and obstetric history will be collected for each patient.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Subcutaneous tissue closure | Subcutaneous tissue closure with 2-0 vicryl suture. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2020-01-10
- Primary completion
- 2022-04-30
- Completion
- 2022-10-20
- First posted
- 2020-01-07
- Last updated
- 2023-02-21
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Israel
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04220294. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.