Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT04218604
The Ablate-by-LAW Study
Feasibility and Efficacy of Tailoring Ablation Index to Left Atrial Wall Thickness During Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: The Ablate By-LAW Study
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 106 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Centro Medico Teknon · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Of all the determinants of lesion creation during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, left atrial wall thickness (LAWT), as measured with multi-detector cardiac tomography (MDCT) is one key element that has been evaluated in some retrospective analyses but is not yet used per protocol to modulate the radiofrequency delivery. Adapting ablation index (AI) to LAWT would be very useful in standardising the ablation procedure with parameters fitted to every patient, enabling the development of a personalized approach that will both: i) increase efficacy by performing transmural lesions to prevent the formation of conduction gaps in the initial lesion set, and ii) increase safety by preventing excessive RF delivery on thin wall areas related to procedural complications, such as cardiac perforation or atrio-esophageal fistula. The investigators sought to evaluate the feasibility, safety, efficacy and reproducibility of guiding AF ablation procedures with the integrated MDCT-derived LAWT information.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Personalized atrial fibrillation ablation | Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation adapting the ablation index (AI) target in a point-by-point manner, according the local left atrial wall thickness (LAWT), as measured by multidetector cardiac tomography (MDCT) |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2020-11-21
- Primary completion
- 2022-07-20
- Completion
- 2022-07-20
- First posted
- 2020-01-06
- Last updated
- 2023-08-30
Locations
5 sites across 3 countries: Germany, Italy, Spain
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04218604. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.