NCT04215627

Comparing the PiCCO Monitor to the Non-invasive Biobeat (BB)-316PW in ICU Patients

Comparison Between Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring, Using the PiCCO Monitor, to a Non-invasive Photoplethysmography Based Device in Hemodynamic Unstable Critically Ill Patients, With Vasopressor Support

• Status: Completed
• Phase: —
• Study type: Observational
• Enrollment: 9 (actual)
• Sponsor: Biobeat Technologies Ltd. · Industry
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years – 99 Years
• Healthy volunteers: —

Summary

The aim of this study is to compare hemodynamic monitoring using the invasive PiCCO device to the BB-613PW wireless, non-invasive PPG-based device, in critically ill patients within the ICU, suffering from hemodynamic instability and in need of vasopressor support. Data will be gathered prospectively and analysed retrospectively.

Conditions

• Critically Ill
• Hemodynamic Instability

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
DEVICE	non-invasive monitoring	Comparing the PiCCO monitor to the non-invasive BB-613PW device in hemodynamically unstable critically ill patients in the ICU

Timeline

• Start date: 2019-12-26
• Primary completion: 2021-04-15
• Completion: 2021-04-30
• First posted: 2020-01-02
• Last updated: 2021-07-07

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Israel

Regulatory

• FDA-regulated device study