Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Unknown

UnknownNCT04212845

Erector Spinae Plane Block vs Transforaminal Epidural Injection

Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Transforaminal Epidural Injection in Chronic Discogenic Low Back Pain

Status
Unknown
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60 (estimated)
Sponsor
Ataturk University · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

Lumbar disc herniation is the main cause of low back pain and radicular leg pain. Steroids administered to the epidural area reduce the inflammatory response and pain by inhibiting the synthesis of proinflammatory agents. Epidural steroid injections are used in the treatment of lumbosacral radicular pain with various techniques including fluoroscopy-guided transforaminal and interlaminar injection. Ultrasound-guided erector spina plan block (ESPB) was first described in 2016 and has been used for postoperative analgesia in many surgeries including thoracic and lumbar dermatomes. The distribution of local anesthesia in the ESPB from the paravertebral area to the transforaminal and epidural space has been shown in studies. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of ultrasound-guided ESPB and fluoroscopic guided transforaminal epidural steroid injection in chronic discogenic low back pain.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DRUGBupivacaine;Dexamethasone Solution for Injection8 mg Dexamethasone and %0.25 bupivacaine
DEVICEFluoroscopyFluoroscopy-guided transforaminal injection
DEVICEUltrasoundUltrasound-guided erector spinae plane block

Timeline

Start date
2020-01-02
Primary completion
2020-06-01
Completion
2020-09-01
First posted
2019-12-30
Last updated
2020-01-07

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Turkey (Türkiye)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04212845. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.