Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT04145089

Comparison of Time Taken for Intubation and Cormack Lehane View Between C-Mac With Glidescope Video Laryngoscopy in Paediatric Patients

Comparative Study of Time Taken for Intubation and Cormack Lehane View Between C-Mac Video Laryngoscopy With Glidescope Video Laryngoscopy in Paediatric Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
64 (actual)
Sponsor
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
3 Years – 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
Accepted

Summary

This study compares the time taken to intubate between Cmac video laryngoscopy with Glidescope video laryngoscopy in paediatric patients aged 3-12 years old.

Detailed description

This study aims to determine whether are both devices comparable to each other in terms of intubation time and Cormack Lehane view in paediatric patients with normal airway undergoing elective surgery.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DEVICEGlidescope video laryngoscopy/ C-MAC video laryngoscopyusage of said devices according to manual

Timeline

Start date
2019-06-01
Primary completion
2019-12-01
Completion
2020-01-01
First posted
2019-10-30
Last updated
2020-07-08

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Malaysia

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04145089. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.

Comparison of Time Taken for Intubation and Cormack Lehane View Between C-Mac With Glidescope Video Laryngoscopy in Paed (NCT04145089) · Clinical Trials Directory