Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT04145089
Comparison of Time Taken for Intubation and Cormack Lehane View Between C-Mac With Glidescope Video Laryngoscopy in Paediatric Patients
Comparative Study of Time Taken for Intubation and Cormack Lehane View Between C-Mac Video Laryngoscopy With Glidescope Video Laryngoscopy in Paediatric Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 64 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 3 Years – 12 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
Summary
This study compares the time taken to intubate between Cmac video laryngoscopy with Glidescope video laryngoscopy in paediatric patients aged 3-12 years old.
Detailed description
This study aims to determine whether are both devices comparable to each other in terms of intubation time and Cormack Lehane view in paediatric patients with normal airway undergoing elective surgery.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DEVICE | Glidescope video laryngoscopy/ C-MAC video laryngoscopy | usage of said devices according to manual |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2019-06-01
- Primary completion
- 2019-12-01
- Completion
- 2020-01-01
- First posted
- 2019-10-30
- Last updated
- 2020-07-08
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Malaysia
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04145089. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.