Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT04139512
One-abutment One-time for Immediate Restoration Procedure in the Esthetic Zone
One-abutment One-time for Immediate Restoration Procedure in the Esthetic Zone: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Conventional Versus Full Digital Workflow
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 18 (actual)
- Sponsor
- University of Liege · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
Summary
Objectives: The aim of this randomized control trial was to compare immediate restoration procedure with a one abutment one-time technique using a conventional versus full digital workflow. Surgical accuracy, provisional fit and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) of.
Detailed description
Objectives: The aim of this randomized control trial was to compare immediate restoration procedure with a one abutment one-time technique using a conventional versus full digital workflow. Surgical accuracy, provisional fit and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) of. Material and method: Sites with single edentulous spaces and neighboring natural teeth were randomized into static computer-aided implant surgery (s-CAIS) or freehand placement implant surgery groups. In both groups, digital implant planning was performed using data from cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and surfaces scans. In the s-CAIS group, a surgical guide was produced and used for fully guided implant surgery, while in the freehand group, the implants were placed in a freehand manner. the deviations in angles, shoulders and apexes between planned and actual implant positions were measured based on postoperative optic impressions. In the test group, a custom-made zirconia abutment and a provisional restoration were immediately placed using a full digital workflow whereas in the control group, a physical impression was taken, and the abutment and crown were placed 10 days post-surgery. Loading outcomes (interproximal contact, occlusal contact, white esthetic score (WES)) were assessed as the PROMs.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | guided surgery | placement of implant with local anesthesia using full guided surgery protocol versus free- hande one |
| PROCEDURE | conventionnel implant placement | placement of dental implant with conventionnal freehand technic |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2018-06-01
- Primary completion
- 2019-06-01
- Completion
- 2019-08-01
- First posted
- 2019-10-25
- Last updated
- 2019-10-25
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Belgium
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04139512. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.