Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT04117633
Laparoscopic Suture Versus Mesh Rectopexy for the Treatment of Persistent Complete Rectal Prolapse in Children
Laparoscopic Suture Versus Mesh Rectopexy for the Treatment of Persistent Complete Rectal Prolapse in Children : A Comparative Randomized Study
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 64 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Al-Azhar University · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 5 Years – 12 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Purpose: to compare Laparoscopic mesh rectopexy with laparoscopic suture rectopexy The operative time, recurrence rate, post-operative constipation, and effect on fecal incontinence, were reported and evaluated for each group Results:
Detailed description
Purpose: to compare Laparoscopic mesh rectopexy with laparoscopic suture rectopexy Patient and Methods: The prospective study was conducted at Pediatric Surgery Department, Al-Azhar university hospitals, Cairo, Egypt . The operative time, recurrence rate, post-operative constipation, and effect on fecal incontinence, were reported and evaluated for each group
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DEVICE | Laparoscopy | Laparoscopic Procedures for Rectopexy |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2010-02-01
- Primary completion
- 2015-01-15
- Completion
- 2018-12-18
- First posted
- 2019-10-07
- Last updated
- 2019-10-08
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04117633. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.