Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT04112901
Effects of Microprocessor-controlled Knee Joints on Community Outcomes
Activity, Mobility, Social Functioning, Mental Health and Quality of Life Outcomes in Limited Mobility Transfemoral and Knee Disarticulation Amputees Using Microprocessor-Controlled Knees or Non-Microprocessor Controlled Knees in the United Kingdom: A Cohort Study
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- —
- Study type
- Observational
- Enrollment
- 330 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- University of Derby · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 95 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- —
Summary
About 21% to 35% of people with limb loss are those who lost their limb at trans-femoral level (i.e. above the knee). The increasing number of diabetes-related limb loss (amputation) and the rising proportion of older adult amputees indicates more amputees with limited mobility in the future. Among other factors, prosthesis success highly depends on the function of the knee joints during daily activities. Presently, there are two categories of prosthetic knee joints; microprocessor-controlled knees (MPKs) and non-microprocessor-controlled knees (n-MPKs). Whilst the n-MPKs are unable to change the knee stiffness, the MPKs alter the joint stiffness and speed of movement according to the users' walking speed. Although past studies indicate that MPKs could result in reduced risk of falls, improved balance and activity in limited mobility amputees, there is a lack of strong evidence on the effect of MPKs on community outcomes. The aim of this study is to compare activity, mobility, social functioning, depression, anxiety, and health-related quality of life in limited mobility trans-femoral or through-knee (i.e. knee disarticulation) amputees who are users of MPKs prosthesis with users of a prosthesis with n-MPKs.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DEVICE | Microprocessor-controlled knee joints | Any type of microprocessor-controlled knee joints will be considered; this includes those controlling stance phase only (e.g. Compact C-Leg), swing phase only (e.g. Smart IP), both swing and stance phases (e.g. Reho knee), or power generating knees (e.g. POWER knee Ossur). |
| DEVICE | Non-microprocessor-controlled knee joints | Any non-microprocessor-controlled knee joints such as prosthesis incorporating hydraulic, polycentric, pneumatic mechanisms, friction or locked knees. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2020-01-15
- Primary completion
- 2020-05-01
- Completion
- 2020-05-30
- First posted
- 2019-10-02
- Last updated
- 2019-10-02
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04112901. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.