Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT04109794
Comparison of Two Techniques in Gingival Recession Treatment. One-year Clinical Follow-up Study
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 42 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Kırıkkale University · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 60 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
Summary
42 patients were treated either with E-CTG (N=20) or SCAF (N=22). The recordings included clinician-based (recession depth, recession width, probing depth, clinical attachment level, keratinized tissue width, tissue thickness, clinical attachment gain (CAG), root coverage (RC), keratinized tissue change (KTC)) and patient-based (wound healing index (WHI), dentine hypersensitivity (DH), tissue appearance, patient expectations and aesthetics) parameters that were taken at baseline, T1 (sixth week), T2 (sixth month) and T3 (first year).
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | E-CTG | Envelope connective tissue graft |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2012-12-01
- Primary completion
- 2014-05-01
- Completion
- 2014-05-01
- First posted
- 2019-09-30
- Last updated
- 2019-09-30
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04109794. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.