Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Unknown

UnknownNCT04093830

Bimodal Stimulation Compared to Unilateral Cochlear Implant

Advantages of Bimodal Stimulation Compared to Unilateral Cochlear Implant Use in Children With Hearing Loss

Status
Unknown
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
25 (estimated)
Sponsor
Assiut University · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
5 Years – 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

The majority of studies about bimodal hearing advantages have been conducted on adults but scant relevant studies into pediatric users, therefore more comparative studies are required to compare the effect of bimodal stimulation to unilateral cochlear implant use in children with severe to profound sensori-neural hearing loss .

Detailed description

There are now many recipients of unilateral cochlear implants who have usable residual hearing in the non-implanted ear. To avoid auditory deprivation and to provide binaural hearing, a hearing aid or a second cochlear implant can be fitted to that ear. When bilateral cochlear implant cannot be used for patients with bilateral hearing impairment, a hearing aid can be used in their non- implanted ear with residual hearing. This is because patients with bilateral hearing loss need bilateral stimulation to develop the neural pathway required for central processing of binaural hearing.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DEVICEhearing aidhearing aid can be used in their non- implanted ear with residual hearing

Timeline

Start date
2020-06-01
Primary completion
2021-06-01
Completion
2022-01-01
First posted
2019-09-18
Last updated
2020-01-18

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04093830. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.