NCT04037956

Tubeless NOSES Versus Laparoscopic Radical Resection for Rectosigmoid Cancers

A Perspective Study to Compare the Tubeless NOSES and Traditional Laparoscopic Radical Resection in Rectosigmoid Cancers (CORNER)

• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 458 (estimated)
• Sponsor: Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years – 75 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

This study is designed to evaluate the short-term and long-term results after Tubeless NOSES for the resection of Rectosigmoid Cancers compared with traditional laparoscopic radical resection.

Detailed description

This is a randomized, single-center, open-label, non- inferiority study designed to evaluate the safety, efficacy and potential benefits of Tubeless NOSES compared with traditional laparoscopic radical resection in approximately 458 subjects with Rectosigmoid Cancers.

Conditions

• Tubeless NOSES
• Traditional Laparoscopic Radical Resection
• Rectosigmoid Cancers

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
PROCEDURE	Tubeless NOSES	The whole procedures undergo by total laparoscopic surgery with no specimen extraction incision in the abdominal wall. The specimen then will be removed through natural orifice such (anal).
PROCEDURE	traditional laparoscopic radical resection	The traditional laparoscopic operation undergo and then a small incision(5-8cm) is made in the middle of the lower abdominal wall to remove the specimen.

Timeline

• Start date: 2019-06-01
• Primary completion: 2025-07-31
• Completion: 2027-07-31
• First posted: 2019-07-30
• Last updated: 2022-03-31

Locations

1 site across 1 country: China