Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT04010032
The Effect of Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus Versus Continuous Epidural Infusion on Postoperative Analgesia in Pediatric Patients
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 60 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Yonsei University · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 4 Years – 13 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of a programmed intermittent bolus injection method compared to conventional continuous infusion in the management of epidural analgesia in pediatric patients correctional osteotomy. As a prospective double blinded randomized controlled trial, the investigators compare the quality of pain control after surgery.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DEVICE | Programmed intermittent epidural bolus | bolus administration of 0.15 ml of ropivacaine 0.15 ml / kg into epidural space every hour(intermittent bolus injection) using PCA device |
| DEVICE | Continuous epidural infusion | Continuous infusion of 0.15% ropivacaine 0.15 ml / kg / h into the epidural space using PCA device using PCA device |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2020-01-01
- Primary completion
- 2021-06-01
- Completion
- 2021-06-01
- First posted
- 2019-07-08
- Last updated
- 2019-12-12
Locations
1 site across 1 country: South Korea
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04010032. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.