Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Recruiting

RecruitingNCT03987308

Comparing the Efficacy and Safety Between Continuous Subcutaneous Beinaglutide and CSII for Newly Diagnosed T2DM Patients

Comparing the Efficacy and Safety Between Short-term Continuous Subcutaneous Beinaglutide Injection and Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion (CSII) for Treatment of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes: a Multicenter, Randomized Open Trial Study With Parallel Controls

Status
Recruiting
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
115 (estimated)
Sponsor
Beijing Hospital · Other Government
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

The efficacy, safety and post-treatment disease control will be compared between groups of continuous subcutaneous Beinaglutide infusion and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) in adult patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes.

Detailed description

Based on the dual roles of glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) in regulating fasting blood glucose and postprandial blood glucose secretion, we adopted a combinational therapeutic model and will administer drug treatments during meals. Newly diagnosed type 2 diabetic patients will be administered continuous subcutaneous Beinaglutide injections using a pump device. The efficacy, safety and disease control after terminating the drug treatments will be compared to those of patients who receive CSII treatment. This is a national-level, multicenter, randomized, open study with parallel controls. The study consists of two phases: a 8-week treatment phase and a 12-week post-treatment follow-up period.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DRUGBeinaglutideBeinaglutide (continuous subcutaneous infusion)
DRUGInsulin aspartInsulin aspart (CSII)

Timeline

Start date
2019-07-02
Primary completion
2025-09-01
Completion
2025-12-01
First posted
2019-06-17
Last updated
2025-05-02

Locations

16 sites across 1 country: China

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03987308. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.