Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Not Yet Recruiting

Not Yet RecruitingNCT03978780

Erector Spinae Block vs. Placebo Block Study

Quality of Recovery Scores Following Erector Spinae Block vs. Sham Block in Ambulatory Breast Cancer Surgery: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Status
Not Yet Recruiting
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60 (estimated)
Sponsor
Women's College Hospital · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

Regional anaesthesia combined with general anaesthesia has become common in the perioperative management of breast cancer surgery patients. Regional techniques have been recognised to provide excellent post-operative analgesia. It enhances multi-modal analgesia regimes while being opioid sparing, reducing incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting and allowing earlier mobilisation/discharge and improving treatment success. Therefore identifying the correct regional anaesthetic technique for this group of patients is important in providing optimum peri-operative care.

Detailed description

The ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane (ESP) block has been recently described for the successful management of thoracic neuropathic pain. The erector spinae muscle is formed by the spinalis, longissimus thoracis, and iliocostalis muscles that run vertically in the back. The ESP block is performed by depositing the local anaesthetic in the fascial plane, deep to the erector spinae muscle, at the tip of the transverse process of the vertebra. Indirect access to the paravertebral space is gained providing analgesia without the risk of needle injury to structures in close proximity. Cadaveric studies have shown both ventral and dorsal rami of thoracic spinal nerves are affected when local anaesthetic is injected deep to the erector spinae muscle. The erector spinae muscle extends along the thoracolumbar spine allowing extensive cranio-caudal spread. The ventral ramus (intercostal nerve) is divided into the anterior and lateral branches. Its terminal branches provide the sensory innervation of the entire anterolateral wall. The dorsal ramus is divided into 2 terminal branches and it gives the sensory innervation to the posterior wall. Anterior spread of the local anaesthetic to the paravertebral space through the costotransverse foramina and the intertransverse complex provides both visceral and somatic analgesia. While recent evidence supports statistically significant reductions in pain and opioid consumption among patients who receive an ESP block compared to systemic analgesia alone, the clinical significance of these differences are questionable the effect of ESP block on the patients' quality of recovery following ambulatory breast cancer surgery remains unclear. Therefore, our objective is to determine whether or not the addition of an ESP block provides both superior analgesia and quality of recovery in patients undergoing ambulatory breast cancer surgery compared to systemic analgesia alone. We hypothesis that patients who received a preoperative ESP block will afford superior postoperative analgesia and improve the quality of recovery over the first 24 hours following surgery compared to those who receive a sham block for their ambulatory breast cancer surgery.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDUREErector spinae plane block80mm 22G block needle will be inserted using an in-plane cranial to caudad approach, the needle will be advanced to target the interfascial plane deep to the erector spinae muscle at the T2 transverse process. Once the needle tip is in the correct position, 20 ml of the local anaesthetic (ropivacaine 0.5% with 1:400,000 epinephrine) will be administered slowly in 5 ml aliquots under frequent aspiration and correct spread in the interfascial plane will be observed.
PROCEDUREPlacebo BlockPatients randomised to the Control group will then receive a sham subcutaneous injection of 0.5ml normal saline injected at the same site as the ESP block under ultrasound guidance to stimulate a real block procedure.

Timeline

Start date
2026-06-01
Primary completion
2027-06-01
Completion
2028-01-01
First posted
2019-06-07
Last updated
2025-07-16

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Canada

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03978780. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.

Erector Spinae Block vs. Placebo Block Study (NCT03978780) · Clinical Trials Directory