Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT03941587

Comparing Intravitreal Aflibercept Monotherapy vs Aflibercept Combined With Reduced Fluence PDT in PCV Treatment

A Multi-center Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Intravitreal Aflibercept Monotherapy vs Aflibercept Combined With Reduced Fluence PDT for the Treatment of Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60 (actual)
Sponsor
Singapore National Eye Centre · Other Government
Sex
All
Age
50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

In this study, we aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an individualized dosing schedule comprising Aflibercept and RF-PDT in patients with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). The primary objective is to compare the polyp closure rate at week 12 between the 2 treatment groups. The secondary aims include comparing visual, anatomical, treatment burden and clinical biomarkers between each treatment group.

Detailed description

Age related macular degeneration (AMD) is one of the leading causes of blindness worldwide. In its exudative or wet form, choroidal neovascularization (CNV) causes an exudative maculopathy resulting in sudden loss of vision with severe effects on patients' quality of life. Intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents (anti-VEGF) have become the mainstay of treatment for AMD CNV and has been shown to have favorable outcomes in most AMD CNV subtypes. In the Asian population, however, a particular subtype called polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV), which affects about 50% of exudative maculopathy, has been shown to have less favorable response to anti-VEGF therapy. The best treatment option for PCV has remained unclear. Current best evidence is from 2 recent randomized controlled trials, the EVEREST II trial which compares the efficacy of ranibizumab with or without photodynamic therapy (PDT) for treatment of PCV and the PLANET trial which compares Aflibercept monotherapy against a rescue PDT when Aflibercept is deemed ineffective. Both trials have reported significant improvement in visual outcomes, however there remain significant unanswered questions and unmet needs regarding the use of Aflibercept and PDT as the best treatment for PCV. In this study, we aim to compare the efficacy of combination Aflibercept with RF-PDT (at baseline) and Aflibercept monotherapy. This particular strategy has not been studies before and represents the amalgamation of unanswered questions from the best evidence to date for the treatment of PCV.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DRUGAflibercept + reduced fluence photodynamic therapy (RF-PDT)Aflibercept dosage of 2mg in 0.05ml along with intravenous infusion of Verteporfin (6mg/m2)followed by laser light at a dosage of 25Joule/cm2
DRUGAflibercept + sham reduced fluence photodynamic therapy (RF-PDT)Aflibercept dosage of 2mg in 0.05ml along with sham photodynamic therapy

Timeline

Start date
2021-02-01
Primary completion
2024-06-06
Completion
2024-06-06
First posted
2019-05-08
Last updated
2025-11-18

Locations

2 sites across 1 country: Singapore

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03941587. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.