Trials / Active Not Recruiting
Active Not RecruitingNCT03937843
Reduced Intensity Radio-chemotherapy for Stage IIA/B Seminoma
Reduced Intensity Radio-chemotherapy for Stage IIA/B Seminoma. A Multicenter, Open Label Phase II Trial With Two Cohorts
- Status
- Active Not Recruiting
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 135 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Swiss Cancer Institute · Academic / Other
- Sex
- Male
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
The trial investigates a stage-adapted (stage IIA or IIB) de-escalation of the standard treatments in the context of a multimodality treatment with chemo- and radiotherapy in seminoma patients. The goal is to safely de-escalate treatment while maintaining/enhancing efficacy, which is not a standard practice yet.
Detailed description
Therapy de-escalation in stage IIA/B seminoma represents an unmet need in clinical practice; efficacy of modern standard of care therapies for these patients is high and only a few patients show disease recurrence but short- and long-term toxicities are a major concern. The magnitude of long-term toxicities is often associated with the intensity of the prescribed treatment modality. A higher cumulative dose of chemotherapy agents and radiation dose has been linked to a sharp increase in long-term sequelae. Combining treatment modalities and diversifying toxicity may thus provide an opportunity to limit long-term treatment sequelae. In this trial carboplatin, cisplatin and etoposide are the Investigational Medicine Products (IMPs). They are all medications with a marketing authorization for several solid tumor types and are standard practice in the treatment of testicular cancer in Switzerland and in the European Union (EU). Radiotherapy is also a standard therapy in this indication. However, the trial investigates a stage-adapted (stage IIA or IIB) de-escalation of these standard treatments in the context of a multimodality treatment with chemo- and radiotherapy. The goal is to safely de-escalate treatment while maintaining/enhancing efficacy, which is not a standard practice yet. The SAKK 01/18 trial is designed with the aim to answer these three questions: * Can the dose of involved-node radiotherapy be safely reduced in the context of multimodality treatment with chemo- and radiotherapy? * Can a more potent chemotherapy in the form of cisplatin/etoposide reduce the rate of distant failure in comparison to carboplatin? * Can a combination of cisplatin/etoposide and involved-node radiotherapy pose a potent treatment regime for patients with recurrence after adjuvant carboplatin or radiotherapy for stage I seminoma? Furthermore, as active surveillance is becoming standard of care in stage I seminoma, it is projected that the amount of patients in need of treatment with stage IIA/B disease will rise, due to more patients developing disease progression during active surveillance. The trial design, trial treatment and trial specifics are a consensus among the Swiss Urogenital Tumors Project Group and the Swiss Radio-oncology Section from the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) and the German Testicular Cancer Study Group (GTCSG).
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DRUG | Carboplatin | Patients in cohort 1 will receive a 60-minute i.v. infusion of carboplatin AUC 7 at day 1 of treatment. |
| DRUG | Cisplatin | Patients in cohort 2 will receive on day 1 to day 5: * a 60-minutes i.v. infusion of etoposide 100mg/m2 per day followed by * a 60-120 minutes i.v. infusion of cisplatin 20mg/m2 per day. |
| DRUG | Etoposide | Patients in cohort 2 will receive on day 1 to day 5: * a 60-minutes i.v. infusion of etoposide 100mg/m2 per day followed by * a 60-120 minutes i.v. infusion of cisplatin 20mg/m2 per day. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2019-07-29
- Primary completion
- 2026-12-31
- Completion
- 2046-12-31
- First posted
- 2019-05-06
- Last updated
- 2026-01-20
Locations
19 sites across 2 countries: Germany, Switzerland
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03937843. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.