Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT03936244
Bipolar Plasmakinetic TURP Vs Monopolar TURP in the Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Bipolar Plasmakinetic Transurethral Resection of the Prostate With Monopolar Transurethral Resection of the Prostate in the Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Due to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 100 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada · Academic / Other
- Sex
- Male
- Age
- —
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Randomized controlled trial with one-year follow-up comparing intra, peri and postoperative outcomes for plasmakinetic transurethral resection of prostate (PK-TURP) and monopolar transurethral resection of prostate (M-TURP) in the treatment of LUTS due to BPH in a tertiary-care public institution
Detailed description
The study is a randomized controlled trial with one-year follow-up comparing intra, peri and postoperative outcomes (efficacy, complications and sequelae) for plasmakinetic transurethral resection of prostate (PK-TURP) and monopolar transurethral resection of prostate (M-TURP) in the treatment of LUTS due to BPH in a tertiary-care public institution (Madrid, Spain)
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DEVICE | Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP) | Randomized allocation to M-TURP or PK-TURP |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2014-12-05
- Primary completion
- 2017-12-12
- Completion
- 2019-12-12
- First posted
- 2019-05-03
- Last updated
- 2020-11-12
- Results posted
- 2020-10-19
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Spain
Regulatory
- FDA-regulated device study
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03936244. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.