Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Unknown

UnknownNCT03926403

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Hypnosis Support on Patient Perception of Outpatient Surgery Under Local Anaesthesia

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Hypnosis Support on Patient Perception of Outpatient Surgery Under Local Anaesthesia in the Maxillo-Facial Surgery Department of the CHU Amiens-Picardie.

Status
Unknown
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
66 (estimated)
Sponsor
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

Many clinical trials assessing the effectiveness of hypnosis have been conducted in recent years, some of which show that hypnosis reduces pain perception better than drug treatments administered to control groups, and that it is at least as effective as other complementary therapies (such as massage, acupuncture, yoga). However, their conclusions are limited by a significant risk of bias, and further studies with rigorous methodology remain necessary. The hypothesis of this study is that hypnosis support methods can reduce anxiety in patients requiring facial surgery under local anaesthesia, and thus improve their medical management. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of hypnosis support on the patient's state of anxiety before and after outpatient surgery under local anaesthesia in the Maxillofacial Surgery Department.

Detailed description

Interventions performed under local anaesthesia may be a particular source of anxiety for some patients, and the management of surgical pain is still a real challenge. In order to avoid the side effects of medications, a lot of caregivers are turning to complementary medicines. Hypnosis in particular has long been used in the non-pharmacological management of pain and anxiety. Many clinical trials assessing the effectiveness of hypnosis have been conducted in recent years, some of which show that hypnosis reduces pain perception better than drug treatments administered to control groups, and that it is at least as effective as other complementary therapies (such as massage, acupuncture, yoga). However, their conclusions are limited by a significant risk of bias, and further studies with rigorous methodology remain necessary. The hypothesis of this study is that hypnosis support methods can reduce anxiety in patients requiring facial surgery under local anaesthesia, and thus improve their medical management. Patients requiring facial surgery under local anaesthesia in an ultra-short circuit will be informed of the study in consultation by the maxillofacial surgeon. If they give their informed consent, a State-Trait Anxiety Inventory ("Spielberger Self-Assessment Questionnaire") will be given to them and collected on the same day. Each patient's anxiety score will be calculated so as to select only patients who are at least lightly anxious about their management (score ≥ 36). The latter will be randomized into 2 groups, one benefiting from experimental management based on hypnosis techniques and the other benefiting from conventional management.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
OTHERState-Trait Anxiety Inventory ("Spielberger Self-Assessment Questionnaire")Patients will be given, a State-Trait Anxiety Inventory ("Spielberger Self-Assessment Questionnaire") that will be collected on the same day. Each patient's initial anxiety score will be calculated so as to select only patients who are at least lightly anxious about their management (score ≥ 36).
PROCEDUREhypnosis techniquesPatients requiring facial surgery under local anaesthesia in an ultra-short circuit will benefit from experimental management based on hypnosis techniques.
PROCEDURElocal anaesthesiaPatients requiring facial surgery under local anaesthesia in an ultra-short circuit will benefit from conventional management (local anaesthesia).

Timeline

Start date
2020-01-28
Primary completion
2023-07-01
Completion
2023-10-01
First posted
2019-04-24
Last updated
2023-03-22

Locations

1 site across 1 country: France

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03926403. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.