Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT03908866
Peripherally Inserted Versus Centrally Inserted Central Venous Catheters in the Neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit
Peripherally Inserted Versus Centrally Inserted Central Venous Catheters in the Neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit. Comparative of Cost-Effectiveness and Safety
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 200 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 100 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
This study aim to compare the cost-effectiveness and safety between centrally and peripherally inserted central venous catheters in neurosurgical intensive care unit patients.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| OTHER | PICC(Peripherally inserted central catheter) | The peripherally inserted central catheter with different sizes (French scale). Trained vascular access nurses will perform the insertion of the PICC, guided by ultrasound at bedside using the Seldinger technique. A suitable sterile field will be established. |
| OTHER | CVC(Central venous catheter ) | The central venous catheter with different sizes (French scale). Trained doctors will perform the insertion of the CVC, using the Seldinger technique. A suitable sterile field will be established. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2019-04-01
- Primary completion
- 2019-12-31
- Completion
- 2019-12-31
- First posted
- 2019-04-09
- Last updated
- 2019-04-23
Locations
1 site across 1 country: China
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03908866. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.