Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT03907111
Compare the Hemostatic Effectiveness of Chitosan Gauze With Traditional Gauze on Open Wound on 10 Participants.
Develop the Biologic-fibrotic Dressing on War Open Bleeding Wounds for Hemostasis.
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 10 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Tri-Service General Hospital · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 20 Years – 80 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
This study recruited 10 subject participants to compare the hemostasis gauze made by chitosan with traditional cotton gauze to see which one is better in bleeding time, bleeding volume, wound infection and wound healing speed when it is used in open wound treatment.
Detailed description
open wound bleeding and infection care policy development is focusing on efficiency to strengthen internal bleeding, pain, avoidance of infection and promoting wound healing wound. With the changes in the social environment, people caring for hemostasis and wound healing have become increasingly demanding. Presently, studies generally aim to stop the bleeding using trauma care technology and functional capabilities combined with each other as well as inhibit lower infection and can also help assist healing wounds care strategy for the protection of human lives. Therefore, the goal of the plan is to establish new care strategies on open wounds infection to stop the bleeding and to improve the health and safety of the people. The researchers will choose the general biological hemostatic gauze to conduct clinical trials comparing the clinical hemostasis focusing on bleeding time, wound infection in the wound and the wound bacteria penetrating situations in the hope to build a better strategy in rapid hemostasis and wound infection care strategy.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DEVICE | Chitosan Gauze | Gauze made by chitosan material |
| DEVICE | placebo | traditional gauze |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2015-10-02
- Primary completion
- 2015-12-31
- Completion
- 2016-02-10
- First posted
- 2019-04-08
- Last updated
- 2019-04-09
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03907111. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.