Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT03891017

Qualitative & Quantitative Comparison of Hydrostatic vs Vacuum Casting Methods in Trans-Tibial Amputees

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
7 (actual)
Sponsor
Loma Linda University · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Accepted

Summary

The purpose of this graduate research study is to compare hydrostatic and vacuum casting techniques using patient mobility indicators, volume displacement, comfort, and overall satisfaction outcomes in trans-tibial amputees.

Detailed description

Visit 1 * Informed Consent * Subject will be casted using both the hydrostatic and vacuum system techniques Visit 2 (7-10 days after Visit 1) * One of two sockets will be randomly assigned and fitted/aligned by investigators * Subject will be asked to perform a Timed Up and Go Test followed by a Six-Minute Walk Test * Subject will fill out a comfort questionnaire for the prosthesis worn Visit 3 (7 to 10 days after Visit 2) • Subject will be asked to do the same testing as you performed in Visit 2

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
OTHERvacuum castingParticipants will be cast using vacuum casting (Ottobock Harmony) method. The method of casting will be randomized via RNG. Participants will be fitted with both sockets and dynamic alignment procedures will be performed. This 15-minute fitting and alignment period will address any extreme gait deviations and initial socket discomforts. After fitting, the participant will then be given a 15-minute adjustment period to wear the device. We will then begin the assessment phase, beginning with the timed Get-Up and Go test and followed by the 6-Minute Walk test. Each patient will perform 3 rounds of each test and patient order will be determined at random. The participants will be given a 10 min break between each series of tests. At the end, a questionnaire will be given.
OTHERhydrostatic castingParticipants will be cast using aqua casting method. The method of casting will be randomized via RNG. Participants will be fitted with both sockets and dynamic alignment procedures will be performed. This 15-minute fitting and alignment period will address any extreme gait deviations and initial socket discomforts. After fitting, the participant will then be given a 15-minute adjustment period to wear the device. We will then begin the assessment phase, beginning with the timed Get-Up and Go test and followed by the 6-Minute Walk test. Each patient will perform 3 rounds of each test and patient order will be determined at random. The participants will be given a 10 min break between each series of tests. At the end, a questionnaire will be given.

Timeline

Start date
2019-04-01
Primary completion
2019-07-01
Completion
2019-07-01
First posted
2019-03-26
Last updated
2019-07-15

Locations

1 site across 1 country: United States

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03891017. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.