Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT03805958
Ultrasound-guided Combined Spinal-epidural Anesthesia: Pre-procedure Versus Real-time Scan
A Randomized Comparison of the Ultrasound-guided Combined Spinal-epidural Anesthesia Technique: Pre-procedure Scan Versus Real-time Scan
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 56 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Seoul National University Hospital · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 19 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
The investigators will compare the success rate, the consumed time, the number of needle passing, the depth and angle of the needle, the anesthetic effect, complications, pain and patient's satisfaction between 'Real-time scan' and 'Pre-procedure scan', when we performing spinal/epidural combined anesthesia.
Detailed description
Traditionally, spinal/epidural combined anesthesia has been performed by palpation of the landmark like Tuffier's line. There are some studies that using ultrasound improves the success rate to regional anesthesia. There are two methods of using ultrasonography, 'Real-time scan' and 'Pre-procedure scan'. Direct comparison of these two methods is not yet studied. So investigators will compare the success rate, the consumed time, the number of needle passing, the depth and angle of the needle, the anesthetic effect, complications, pain and patient's satisfaction.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | realtime ultrasonography | Applying realtime ultrasound during the combined anesthesia |
| PROCEDURE | prescan ultrasonography | Applying realtime ultrasound before the combined anesthesia |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2019-11-15
- Primary completion
- 2020-01-15
- Completion
- 2020-01-15
- First posted
- 2019-01-16
- Last updated
- 2019-09-23
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03805958. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.