Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT03804281
Clinical Evaluation of Conventional Versus Microsurgical Techniques of Esthetic Crown Lengthening
Clinical Evaluation of Gingival Margin Stability Following Conventional Versus Microsurgical Techniques of Esthetic Crown Lengthening
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 24 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Cairo University · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
Summary
the study compare gingival margin stability following conventional approach versus microsurgical approach of esthetic crown lengthening in management of patients with short clinical crowns in the upper anterior region.In management of patients with short clinical crowns in the upper anterior region, there is no difference in gingival margin stability between conventional and microsurgical approaches of esthetic crown lengthening.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Test group | The surgery will be done with the use of 4x magnification loop, the knives are micro blades and micro-sutures 7//0 used with the microsurgical instruments kit |
| PROCEDURE | Control group | esthetic crown lengthening with conventional approach with an internal bevel incision, following CEJ anatomy, this will be followed by an intra-sulcular incision, removal of the strip of outlined marginal gingiva and elevation of a mucoperiosteal flap to the level of the alveolar bone crest. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2019-02-01
- Primary completion
- 2020-01-01
- Completion
- 2020-08-01
- First posted
- 2019-01-15
- Last updated
- 2019-01-18
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03804281. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.