Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT03799861

Newborn Heart Rate as a Catalyst for Improved Survival

Newborn Heart Rate as a Catalyst for Improved Survival (NeoBeat Study)

Status
Completed
Phase
Study type
Observational
Enrollment
24,034 (actual)
Sponsor
American Academy of Pediatrics · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
28 Weeks – 45 Weeks
Healthy volunteers
Accepted

Summary

Heart rate (HR) is not routinely assessed during newborn resuscitations in low- and lower-middle income countries (LMICs). Many non-breathing newborns classified as fresh stillbirths have a heartbeat and are live born. The effect of a low-cost monitor for measuring HR on the problem of misclassification of stillbirths in LMICs is unknown. Knowledge of HR during newborn resuscitation might also result in timely administration of appropriate interventions, and improvement in outcomes. Helping Babies Breathe (HBB), a resuscitation algorithm developed by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), is widely accepted as the standard of care for newborn resuscitation in low-resource settings. In keeping with the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) recommendations that HR be measured during newborn resuscitation, HBB calls for HR assessment after 1 minute of positive-pressure ventilation with good chest movement (or sooner if there is a helper who can palpate/auscultate heart rate). However, given the frequent reality of a single provider attending deliveries in LMICs, as well as the currently available methods for assessing HR (i.e. palpitation or auscultation), assessment of HR is challenging to perform without delaying or stopping the provision of other life-saving interventions such as bag and mask ventilation. The effect of low-cost, continuous HR monitoring to guide resuscitation in these settings is unknown. NeoBeat is a low-cost, battery-operated device designed by Laerdal Global Health for the measurement of newborn HR. The device can be placed rapidly on a newborn by a single provider, and within 5 seconds, displays HR digitally. A preliminary trial of NeoBeat in 349 non-breathing newborns in Tanzania detected a HR in 67% of newborns classified as stillbirths, suggesting up to two thirds of fresh stillbirths may be misclassified in similar settings. This trial will evaluate: 1) the effectiveness of HBB in combination with NeoBeat for vital status detection on reduction of reported stillbirths, and 2) the effectiveness of HR-guided HBB on effective breathing at 3 minutes. The primary hypothesis is that implementation of HBB with measurement of HR using NeoBeat will decrease the reported total stillbirth rate by 15% compared to standard care. The secondary hypothesis is that implementation of HR-guided HBB will increase the proportion of newborns not breathing well at birth who are effectively breathing at 3 minutes by 50% compared to HBB with NeoBeat.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
OTHEREpoch 2: HBB with NeoBeatAt the beginning of Epoch 2, all birth attendants in each of the 3 maternity units will participate in a 2 day workshop in Kinshasa in French that will include instructions regarding use of NeoBeat and training in HBB 2.0. Participants will be introduced to NeoBeat, which will include practice with NeoBeat using the NeoNatalie newborn simulator. This training will be conducted in French using typical adapted training materials for this program that incorporate placement of NeoBeat at appropriate times in the algorithm, including a flipchart and NeoNatalie. Participants will complete the pre and post knowledge check questionnaire for the training as well as the Observed Standardized Clinical Exams (OSCEs) with the incorporation of use of NeoBeat into the OSCEs.
OTHEREpoch 3: HR-guided HBBAt the beginning of Epoch 3, all birth attendants in each of the 3 maternity units will participate in a 1 day workshop in Kinshasa in French that will instruct them in an adapted, HR-guided HBB algorithm. This training will include simulation with NeoNatalie and NeoBeat. Participants will complete a pre and post knowledge check questionnaire for the training as well as the Observed Standardized Clinical Exams (OSCEs).

Timeline

Start date
2018-07-05
Primary completion
2020-07-30
Completion
2020-10-31
First posted
2019-01-10
Last updated
2022-03-31

Locations

3 sites across 1 country: Democratic Republic of the Congo

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03799861. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.